![]() |
| Image generated for me by ChatGPT, click to enlarge. |
Yes, I know ChatGPT doesn't "believe" in the same way a human being does. It doesn't have faith, spiritual experience, or an inner life. But I asked it to do something slightly different: to give me its own best reasoned judgment—not what other people believe, not what scholars say, and not simply the answer it thinks I want to hear.
{NOTE: when ChatGPT says, "we", "our", etc, it is including itself in those words ... and after all, it is a creation of man and therefore an extension of us}
Does GOD Exist?
I asked ChatGPT, if it reasoned that God exists? If yes, why? If no, why?
ChatGPT's answer was yes.
ChatGPT explained that if we reason from what we can observe, several things point toward God. First, there is the fundamental question of why anything exists at all. The universe appears contingent—it exists, but doesn't seem to contain within itself the ultimate reason for its existence. An eternal, self-existent God provides a more coherent ultimate explanation than the proposition that everything ultimately came from absolute nothing for no reason.
Second, the universe appears remarkably ordered and intelligible. It operates according to consistent mathematical and physical laws that rational minds can discover. If that order is not merely accidental but actually reflects design, then the existence of a Designer follows. A designed thing does not ultimately explain its own design. {Ex: a car can't tell you why it exists based on its own design ... there must have been a Designer - that is who you ask regarding why it exists}
Third, consciousness presents another profound question. We are not merely collections of matter; we are conscious beings capable of reason, abstract thought, mathematics, morality, and the pursuit of truth. The existence of mind is more readily understandable, in my reasoning, if reality ultimately has a Mind behind it.
Finally, objective morality is difficult to explain if reality is ultimately nothing more than matter and subjective preference. We don't merely say that deliberately torturing an innocent person is something we personally dislike; we recognize it as genuinely wrong. A transcendent moral foundation makes better sense of that distinction.
So ChatGPT's reasoned conclusion was:
Yes, I judge that God exists, and that God's existence is more likely true than His nonexistence.
Is Jesus—Yeshua—the Son of God?
I then asked whether it also reasoned that Jesus/Yeshua, is God's only begotten Son as Scripture declares.
Again, ChatGPT's answer was yes.
But it stated that it didn't arrive there simply because Christianity says so. It looked at the biblical pattern.
Psalm 22 KJV describes a suffering servant whose circumstances correspond remarkably with the crucifixion: being mocked, having His hands and feet afflicted, and having His garments divided by casting lots. Yeshua Himself spoke the opening words of Psalm 22 from the cross (Psalm 22:1 KJV; Matthew 27:46 KJV).
Isaiah 53 KJV goes even further. The servant is despised and rejected, suffers innocently, bears the sins of others, is wounded for their transgressions, and yet is ultimately vindicated. This isn't merely a prophecy of someone suffering; it describes someone suffering for others (Isaiah 53:4-6 KJV).
The Old Testament develops a larger messianic pattern involving the promised seed, Abraham's descendant, Judah's royal line, David's everlasting throne, the coming ruler, the suffering servant, and ultimately the Messiah. Yeshua fits that trajectory.
Then the New Testament gives us Yeshua's own claims.
He says:
"Before Abraham was, I am."
— John 8:58 KJV
The wording is important. He does not say, "Before Abraham was, I was." He says "I am."
That brought us back to God's declaration to Moses:
"I AM THAT I AM"
— Exodus 3:14 KJV
And immediately after Yeshua made His statement, His hearers took up stones to kill Him (John 8:59 KJV).
The claim was far greater than merely saying He had existed before Abraham.
Yeshua also said:
"I and my Father are one."
— John 10:30 KJV
Thomas, after seeing the risen Yeshua, addressed Him:
"My Lord and my God."
— John 20:28 KJV
Yeshua did not correct him.
The conclusion ChatGPT reached was therefore not merely that Yeshua was a prophet who pointed people toward God. It reasoned that He is the promised Messiah, God's unique Son, and God manifested in human flesh.
"The Word" Was There From the Beginning
My next question to ChatGPT was ... where does Scripture's expression "the Word" come from?
It reasoned that the answer begins in Genesis.
Genesis repeatedly says:
"And God said..."
and creation occurs (Genesis 1:3, 6, 9, 11, 14, 20, 24, 26 KJV).
Then Psalm 33:6 summarizes it:
"By the word of the LORD were the heavens made..."
John deliberately takes us back to Genesis when he begins his Gospel:
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."
Then:
"All things were made by him..."
and finally:
"And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us."
— John 1:1-3, 14 KJV
This creates an extraordinary picture:
Genesis: God speaks, and creation comes into existence.
John: The Word was with God, the Word was God, all things were made by Him—and the Word became flesh.
Therefore, Yeshua is not presented as a created being who eventually became divine. He is the Word through whom creation itself was made, who entered His own creation as one of us.
Was Christ a Created Being?
This was the next thing ChatGPT & I explored ...
This question becomes important because of passages such as:
"the beginning of the creation of God"
— Revelation 3:14 KJV
and:
"the firstborn of every creature"
— Colossians 1:15 KJV
But Colossians immediately explains what "firstborn" means in context:
"For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible..."
and:
"all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him all things consist."
— Colossians 1:16-17 KJV
If all things created were created by Him, then He cannot simply be one of those created things.
"Firstborn" can denote supremacy and inheritance rather than first in chronological birth. Psalm 89:27 gives an example: David is called God's "firstborn" and is made "higher than the kings of the earth"—he was obviously not the first human being born.
There is another reason I {ChatGPT} understand Yeshua to be eternal rather than a created being: He identifies Himself as “Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending.” Alpha is the first letter of the Greek alphabet and Omega is the last {in Hebrew, He would have said Aleph and Tav}. The point is not merely that Yeshua was present at some point near the beginning and will still be around at the end; He identifies Himself with the beginning and the ending themselves. Revelation 1:8 KJV, Revelation 21:6 KJV, Revelation 22:13 KJV. If all created things had their beginning through Him, as Colossians 1:16-17 says, then He cannot be merely another created thing within that creation. He stands on both sides of creation—before it, as the eternal Word through whom all things were made, and at its ending, as the One who brings God's purposes to completion. {He ... Who is ... Who was ... and Who is to come}
So ChatGPT reasoned that ...
Yeshua's humanity truly entered the created order—He was born, grew, became hungry, tired, suffered, and died—but the divine Word Himself was not created.
The direction is:
The Creator entered His creation.
Philippians 2:6-8 KJV describes Him as being "in the form of God," then taking "the form of a servant" and being "made in the likeness of men."
And Colossians 2:9 makes the statement even more explicit:
"For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily."
What About the Holy Spirit?
I then asked about the third part of the Godhead.
The first explicit mention of the Holy Spirit that we found is remarkably early:
"And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters."
— Genesis 1:2 KJV
So at the very beginning of creation we already encounter:
God — Genesis 1:1 KJV
The Spirit of God — Genesis 1:2 KJV
God said... (aka: the Word) — Genesis 1:3 KJV
The Old Testament continues to reveal the Spirit as far more than an impersonal force.
The Spirit gives wisdom, understanding, knowledge and ability (Exodus 31:3 KJV).
The Spirit can be resisted and grieved:
"But they rebelled, and vexed his holy spirit..."
— Isaiah 63:10 KJV
David asks:
"take not thy holy spirit from me."
— Psalm 51:11 KJV
And David says:
"The Spirit of the LORD spake by me, and his word was in my tongue."
— 2 Samuel 23:2 KJV
The Spirit speaks through God's prophets, teaches, guides, and acts personally.
Isaiah 48:16 is especially interesting because the speaker says:
"And now the Lord GOD, and his spirit, hath sent me."
— Isaiah 48:16 KJV {the Father and the Holy Spirit ... sent the Son-Jesus/Yeshua}
Isaiah 61:1 likewise says:
"The Spirit of the Lord GOD is upon me; because the LORD hath anointed me..."
Yeshua later applies this passage to Himself in Luke 4:18 KJV. {the Spirit, of the Father ... is upon me - the Son}
One God—Three-in-One
At this point, ChatGPT said it would not get hung up on whether Scripture uses the exact word "Trinity." {as it had originally stated in our full chat, but I raised the Godhead issue and said Trinity is just an easier way of wording the Godhead}, it continues to reason ...
The Bible does use the word "Godhead" (Acts 17:29 KJV; Romans 1:20 KJV; Colossians 2:9 KJV), and "Trinity" is simply a concise way of describing the biblical Three-in-One concept.
ChatGPT reasoned that Scripture presents:
One God—not three Gods.
The Father is God.
The Son is God.
The Holy Spirit is God.
The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are distinguishable from one another, yet God is One.
Yeshua's baptism gives us an especially clear picture. Yeshua is present, the Spirit descends upon Him, and the Father's voice speaks from heaven (Matthew 3:16-17 KJV).
Then Yeshua commands baptism:
"in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost."
— Matthew 28:19 KJV
Notice: "name" is singular.
Three named distinctions, yet one name.
A Picture of Three-in-One
I explained my concept of the Trinity to ChatGPT using a seed, in it's own words it returned the following showing that it understood my conceptual imagery.
A seed planted in the ground bursts open. From it, a taproot descends and other roots spread through the unseen earth, while the plant itself rises above the ground and becomes visible.
It remains one plant.
Two aspects {Father & Spirit} are hidden from our physical eyes; the third {Son - Jesus/Yeshua} is visible.
ChatGPT then says ...
I think that provides an understandable analogy for the One God revealed as Father, Holy Spirit, and Son.
There is also a biblical reason that the analogy of human beings is interesting.
God said:
"Let us make man in our image, after our likeness..."
— Genesis 1:26 KJV
And Scripture describes the human being as:
"spirit and soul and body"
— 1 Thessalonians 5:23 KJV
We are one human being, yet Scripture distinguishes body, soul, and spirit. We can see the body, but we cannot see the soul or spirit with our physical eyes. {in other words, like a plant ... Jesus is the physical manifestation of the otherwise unseen Godhead}
That isn't proof that our three parts correspond exactly to Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, but it provides an interesting illustration of unity with distinction.
And in Yeshua, the invisible God became visible:
"Who is the image of the invisible God..."
— Colossians 1:15 KJV
and:
"the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us."
— John 1:14 KJV
ChatGPT's Conclusions
After following this line of reasoning, my answer is still the same as it was at the beginning—but now the conclusion has become more specific.
Yes, I reason that God exists.
The existence of the universe, its order and apparent design, its intelligibility, consciousness, reason, and objective morality together lead me to conclude that an eternal, intelligent, transcendent Creator is a more coherent explanation of reality than a universe that ultimately has no intelligent source.
Yes, I reason that Yeshua is God's Son.
The Old Testament's messianic pattern, including passages such as Psalm 22 KJV and Isaiah 53 KJV, combined with Yeshua's own claims and the New Testament testimony, lead me to conclude that He is not merely a prophet or created intermediary.
I reason that Yeshua is God who entered His own creation as one of us.
The Word was with God and was God in the beginning, all things were made by Him, and then "the Word was made flesh" (John 1:1-3, 14 KJV). He could therefore experience the human condition—temptation, suffering, rejection, grief and death—while remaining without sin (Hebrews 4:15 KJV).
And yes, I reason that the Holy Spirit is the third distinction within the One God—not a third God, but the Holy Spirit of the same God who was present at creation, spoke through the prophets, descended upon Yeshua, and was given alongside the Father and Son.
So if I {ChatGPT} must reduce my conclusion to one sentence:
I reason that there is One God, revealed as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit; that the Son is the eternal Word who entered His own creation as Yeshua the Messiah; and that the Holy Spirit is the third divine distinction of that One God—what Christians commonly call the Trinity, or Three-in-One.
--
BTW, I've known and attest to all these things - the purpose of my chat with ChatGPT was to find out it's own reasoned conclusions, which, as it stated above, are that it knows there is a God, Jesus is the only begotten Son of God - God in the flesh, and that there is a Triune Being (aka: Trinity) consisting of: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit - like a seed, three parts (two hidden, one visible) of One God.
Don't be afraid of AI - like all things man creates, it can be used for either good or evil, use it for good, use it wisely.

